SQL 2005 all the way to 2014

Discussion in 'microsoft.public.sqlserver.server' started by Raj, Jun 2, 2010.

  1. Raj

    Raj Guest

    Our devs would like to stay on SQL 2005 all the way until 2014 or so.. They
    believe they will retire the app by then. What should we keep them informed
    about as far as the cons of that approach ?

    I understand mainstream support comes to an end next year... and we can go
    extended support ... What does that really mean ? Are they the same kind of
    support from MS ? I understand they wont get the new features,etc.. and they
    don't care.. So I'm looking at some potential operational/licensing/support
    issues that we need to consider if we do decide to run with SQL 2005 for the
    next 5 years or so...
     
    Raj, Jun 2, 2010
    #1
    1. Advertisements

  2. Raj

    Tom Cooper Guest

    The differences between mainstream and extended support is discussed at
    http://support.microsoft.com/gp/lifepolicy. The dates for support timelines
    for various products/versions can be found at
    http://support.microsoft.com/gp/lifeselect (you'll find SQL 2005 by clicking
    on More-Servers in the Server category. You are right, the final date for
    mainstream support for SQL 2005 is April 12, 2011 and the final date for
    extended support is April 12, 2016.

    Tom
     
    Tom Cooper, Jun 2, 2010
    #2
    1. Advertisements

  3. Raj

    GS Guest

    may be off topic.
    I believe we have heard that a particular app will retire by certain date.
    however, look at the number legacy app out there people thought would be
    obsolete but still in use., worse the horrendous effort spent in keeping
    them running
     
    GS, Jun 3, 2010
    #3
  4. Raj,

    What it really means is that it will cost you 10 times over the cost of
    upgrading to SQL Server 2008 and whatever it is that comes out next. You
    will want fixes for things long since fixed in later versions and will
    struggle to find staff that can remember that far back as time goes
    further forward (or worse... get stuck with 'old' staff that couldn't
    keep up :) ).

    Irrespective of the success of 2005, 2008 has productivity benefits for
    the developer and DBA and a whole new generation better reports. Reports
    alone are worth the upgrade but there are other features (indexing,
    compression, SSIS, agent management, cpu efficiency, ram management,
    etc...)

    Upgrading is cheap and simple. I am struggling to see why a company
    would resist. It isn't a case of jumping every version as it lands
    (although we like doing that) but you're talking about a decade. In
    computing terms that is positively an eon.

    Geoff Schaller
    Software Objectives
     
    Geoff Schaller, Jun 4, 2010
    #4
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.